Visual Function and Neuropsychological Profiling of Idiopathic Infantile Nystagmus.

Though considered a benign condition, idiopathic infantile nystagmus (IIN) may be associated with decreased visual acuity and oculo-motor abnormalities, resulting in developmental delays and poor academic performance. Nevertheless, the specific visual function profile of IIN and its possible impact on neuropsychological development have been poorly investigated. To fill this gap, we retrospectively collected the clinical data of 60 children presenting with IIN over a 10-year period (43 male; mean age of 7 years, range of 2 months-17 years, 9 months). The majority of the subjects in our cohort presented with reduced visual acuity for far distances and normal visual acuity for near distances, associated with oculo-motor abnormalities. The overall scores of cognitive and visual-cognitive tests were in the normal range, but revealed peculiar cognitive and visual-cognitive profiles, defined by specific frailties in processing speed and visual-motor integration. The same neuropsychological profiles characterize many neurodevelopmental disorders and may express a transnosographic vulnerability of the dorsal stream. As the first study to explore the neuropsychologic competencies in children with IIN, our study unveils the presence of subclinical frailties that need to be addressed to sustain academic and social inclusion.

Visual Function and Neuropsychological Profile in Children with Cerebral Visual Impairment.

Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) has become the leading cause of children's visual impairment in developed countries. Since CVI may negatively affect neuropsychomotor development, an early diagnosis and characterization become fundamental to define effective habilitation approaches. To date, there is a lack of standardized diagnostic methods to assess CVI in children, and the role of visual functions in children's neuropsychological profiles has been poorly investigated. In the present paper, we aim to describe the clinical and neuropsychological profiles and to investigate the possible effects of visual functions on neuropsychological performance of a cohort of children diagnosed with CVI. Fifty-one children with CVI were included in our retrospective analysis (inclusion criteria: verbal IQ > 70 in Wechsler scales; absence of significant ocular involvement). For each participant, we collected data on neuropsychological assessment (i.e., cognitive, cognitive visual, and learning abilities), basic visual functions (e.g., Best Corrected Visual Acuity­BCVA, contrast sensitivity, and ocular motor abilities) and global development features (e.g., neurological signs and motor development delay) based on standardized tests, according to patients' ages. The results showed that oculomotor dysfunction involving saccades and smooth pursuit may be a core symptom of CVI and might have a significant impact on cognitive visual and other neuropsychological abilities. Furthermore, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity may influence cognitive, cognitive visual, and academic performances. Our findings suggest the importance of a comprehensive assessment of both visual and neuropsychological functions in children when CVI is suspected, which is needed to provide a more comprehensive functional profile and define the best habilitation strategy to sustain functional vision.

Vergence and accommodation disorders in children with vertigo: A need for evidence-based diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Previous clinical evaluations have demonstrated a difference in eye movements in healthy children compared to children with vertigo without vestibular pathology. It has also been previously shown that accommodation and vergence responses can be measured with remote haploscopic photo refractor (RHP) devices. We have developed a method, called REMOBI (patent US8851669, WO2011073288) that allows us to test eye movements in three-dimensional space without decoupling vergence and accommodation.[1]. METHODS: We compared standard clinical testing of vergence and accommodation responses separately, with laboratory simultaneous measurement of vergence and accommodation in healthy children, 31 with vertigo (mean age 11 SD +/- 3.02), and 53 without (mean age 10 SD +/- 3.29). Children diagnosed with vertigo then underwent orthoptic rehabilitation for vergence and accommodation disorders and were re-evaluated twice using laboratory testing: once after 12 sessions and once 3-months after completing the sessions. FINDINGS: Using the clinical tests, significant differences were found between the vertigo and healthy groups: D' (break point of divergence near), D2 (second measurement of divergence after convergence far), D2' (second measurement of divergence after convergence near), C (break point of convergence far), and C' (break point of convergence near). However, no significant differences in accommodation or vergence were seen between the two groups using laboratory tests (RHP and REMOBI). Further, there was no difference in laboratory measurements in children with vertigo before, after, and 3 months after clinical rehabilitation. INTERPRETATION: We postulate the difference in these two tests is because the laboratory tests are more accurate and more realistic because they measure accommodation and vergence simultaneously, as it incorporates a stronger binocular coordination response not appreciated by current clinical measurements. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate whether clinicians should consider adding objective measurements, such as using a RHP device, when diagnosing patients with vergence and accommodation disorders, to avoid prescribing costly and timely rehabilitation programs that do not improve accommodative and vergence movements. FUNDING: We thank the Fulbright Foundation, along with the University of California, San Francisco, for the research fellowship to Lindsey M Ward. This study is part of the PHRC VERVE, hospital research program, run at the hospital Robert Debré and supported by Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique, France. The funding sources had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.